The inevitable mutability of collective and structural disputes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53798/suprema.2024.v4.n1.a370Keywords:
Structural collective disputes, Structural litigation, Mutability, Structural Decision, ProspectivityAbstract
This article introduces a transdisciplinary model to understanding the nature of collective disputes from a legal-sociological perspective. The sociological approach of “Emergentism,” which seeks a causal explanation to the transformative potential of social phenomena, provides a useful theoretical framework to this paradigm. In view of this, this article proposes that “mutability” be understood as an intrinsic feature of the social processes of collective disputes, thereby inherent in different kinds of conflict. Criteria for its qualitative measurement are also provided. This article further evaluates the presence and the extent of the mutability property of collective disputes that are deemed to be structural by demonstrating the relationship between the degree of the mutability of the dispute, the prospective tendency of its remedial measures, and the importance of preserving flexibility in its remedial procedures to permit ongoing reevaluations of the litigious conflict’s characteristics and circumstances.
Downloads
References
ALTMAN, James M. Implementing a Civil Rights Injunction: A Case Study of NAACP v. Brennan. In: Columbia Law Review, v.78, n.4, p. 739-770, 1978.
ARCHER, Margaret S. Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
ARCHER, Margaret. Social Integration and System Integration: Developing the Distinction. In: Sociology, v.30, n.4, p. 679-699, nov.1996.
ARCHER, Margaret. Being Human: The Problem of Agency. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
BHASKAR, Roy. The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences. 3.ed. London: Routledge, 2005.
BOURDIEU, Pierre. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Translated by Richard Nice. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1977.
CHAYES, Abram. The Role of the Judge in Public Law Litigation. In: Harvard Law Review, v.89, n.7, p. 1281-1316, Maio.1976.
COCHRANE, Glynn. Development Anthropology. New York: Oxford University Press, 1971.
COLEMAN, James S. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1994.
DURKHEIM, Émile. Le Suicide: Étude de Sociologie. Paris: FAncienne Librairie Germer Bailliere et Cie., Félix Alcan, éditeur, 1897.
DURKHEIM, Émile. The Nature of Society and Causal Explanation. In: American Journal of Sociology, Letter to the Editor, v.3, p. 848-849, 1898.
DURKHEIM, Émile. The Psychological Conception of Society. In: Revue Philosophique, Letter to the Directeur, v.52, p. 704, 1901.
DURKHEIM, Émile. The Rules of Sociological Method. In: LUKES, Steven [Org.]. The Rules of Sociological Method and Selected Texts on Sociology and its Method. 2.ed. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
ELDER-VASS, Dave. For Emergence: Refining Archer’s account of Social Structure. In: Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, v.37, n.1, p. 25-44, 2007.
ELDER-VASS, Dave. Reconciling Archer and Bourdieu in an Emergentist Theory of Action. In: Sociological Theory, v.25, n.4, p. 325-346, 2007.
ELLIOTT, Anthony; TURNER, Bryan. On Society. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2012.
EPSTEIN, Brian. What is Individualism in Social Ontology? Ontological Individualism vs. Anchor Individualism. In: ZAHLE, Julie; COLLIN, Finn [Org.]. Rethinking the Individualism-Holism Debate: Essays in the Philosophy of Social Science. Dordrecht: Springer, 2014, p. 17-38.
FISS, Owen. Civil Rights Injunctions. In: Addison Harris Lecture, Paper 7, 1978.
FISS, Owen M. The Forms of Justice. In: Harvard Law Review, v.93, n.1, p. 1-58, Nov.1979.
FISS, Owen M. Two Models of Adjudication. In: GOLDWIN, Robert A., SCHAMBRA, William A. [Org.]. How Does the Constitution Secure Rights? Washington: American Enterprise Institute, 1985, p. 36-49.
FLETCHER, William A. The Discretionary Constitution: Institutional Remedies and Judicial Legitimacy. In: The Yale Law Journal, v.91, n.4, p. 635-697, mar.1982.
GIDDENS, Anthony. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1986.
LOCKWOOD, David. Social Integration and System Integration. In: ZOLLSCHAN, George K.; HIRSCH, Walter [Org.]. Explorations in Social Change. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1964, p. 244-257.
MANDELBAUM, Maurice. Societal Facts. In: The British Journal of Sociology, v.6, n.4, p. 305-317, dez.1955.
MOUZELIS, Nicos. Social and System Integration: Lockwood, Habermas, Giddens. In: Sociology, v.31, n.1, fev.1997, p. 112.
PLEASANTS, Nigel. Free Will, Determinism and the ‘Problem’ of Structure and Agency in the Social Sciences. In: Philosophy of the Social Sciences, v.49, n.1, p. 3-30, 2019.
THOMPSON, John B. The Theory of Structuration. In: HELD, David; THOMPSON, John B. [Org.]. Social Theory of Modern Societies: Anthony Giddens and his Critics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003, p. 56-76.
VIANA, Thaís Costa Teixeira. Tomada de Decisão Estratégica e Modelos Agregativos de Sujeitos no Processo Coletivo Estrutural. Tese (doutorado). Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Faculdade de Direito, 2022.
VITORELLI, Edilson. Levando os Conceitos a Sério: Processo Estrutural, Processo Coletivo, Processo Estratégico e suas Diferenças. In: Revista de Processo, v.284/2018, p. 333-369, out.2018.
VITORELLI, Edilson. O Devido Processo Legal Coletivo: Dos Direitos aos Litígios Coletivos. 2.ed.rev.ampl. e atual. São Paulo: Thomson Reuters Brasil, 2019.
VITORELLI, Edilson. Processo Civil Estrutural: Teoria e Prática. 3.ed.rev.atual.e ampl. São Paulo: Editora JusPodivm, 2022.
WEBER, Max. Economy and Society. A New Translation. Tradução de Keith Tribe. Cambridge, Massachusetts e London, England: Harvard University Press, 2019.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Thais Costa Teixeira Viana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
