O perfil das Constituições contemporâneas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53798/suprema.2021.v1.n1.a27Palavras-chave:
Constituições contemporâneas, processo constituinte, participação públicaResumo
Este artigo analisa o perfil das Constituições contemporâneas. Busca investigar por que as Constituições contemporâneas têm sido chamadas de “Constituições transnacionais”. Seu propósito é oferecer uma resposta a essa questão por meio de resultados de vários importantes estudos empíricos realizados nos últimos anos, correlacionando esses achados com o processo constituinte participativo. Em outras palavras, investiga a relação entre o conteúdo das Constituições e a vontade popular. Conclui que a captura política aumenta sobremaneira o risco de o resultado do processo constituinte, por mais participativo que possa ter sido, ser bastante desapontador e decepcionante, com Constituições alienadas, enganosas, impopulares, prolixas e não duradouras. Por essa razão, conclui também ser necessária uma reflexão sobre como realmente deve ser um processo constituinte participativo, a começar pela própria ideia de participação.
Downloads
Referências
ARATO, Andrew. Constitution making under occupation: the politics of imposed revolution in Iraq. New York: Columbia University Press, 2009.
BAILYN, Bernard. The ideological origins of the american revolution. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press, 1990.
BECK, Colin J.; DRORI, Gili S.; MEYER, John W. World influences on human rights language in Constitutions: a cross-national study. International Sociology, v. 27, n. 4, p. 483-501, 2012. Disponível em: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0268580912443575. Acesso em: 26 mar. 2021.
BILLIS, George Athan. American constitutionalism heard round the world, 1776-1989: a global perspective. New York: New York University Press, 2009.
BRADY, Paul. Social, political and philosophical foundations of the Irish Constitutional Order. In: GALLIGAN, Denis J.; VERSTEEG, Mila (ed.). Social and political foundations of constitutions. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
CHOUDHRY, Sujit. The migration of constitutional ideas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
COPE, Kevin L. South Sudan’s dualistic Constitution. In: GALLIGAN, Denis J.; VERSTEEG, Mila (ed.). Social and political foundations of constitutions. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
COPE, Kevin L. The intermestic constitution: lessons from the world’s newest nation. Virginia Journal of International Law, v. 53, n. 3, 2013.
COPPEDGE, Michael. Diffusion is no iIllusion: neighbor emulation in the third wave of democracy. Comparative Political Studies, v. 39, n. 4, 2006. Disponível em: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0010414005276666. Acesso em: 26 mar. 2021.
DIXON, Rosalind; GINSBURG, Tom. Deciding not to decide: deferral in constitutional design. International Journal of Constitutional Law, v. 9, n. 3-4, 2011. Disponível em: https://academic.oup.com/icon/article/9/3-4/636/657611. Acesso em: 26 mar. 2021.
DIXON, Rosalind; POSNER, Eric. The limits of constitutional convergence. Chicago Journal of International Law, v. 11, n. 2, 2010. Disponível em: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4468&context=book_chapters. Acesso em: 26 mar. 2021.
DORF, Michael C. The aspirational constitution. The George Washington Law Review, v. 77, 2009. Disponível em: https://www.gwlr.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/77-5-6-Dorf.pdf. Acesso em: 26 mar. 2021.
ELKINS, Zachary. Constitutional networks. In: KAHLER, Miles (ed.). Networked politics: agency, power, and governance. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2009.
ELKINS, Zachary. Diffusion and the constitutionalization of Europe. Comparative Political Studies, v. 43, n. 8-9, p. 978, 2010. Disponível em: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0010414010370433. Acesso em: 26 mar. 2021.
ELKINS, Zachary; GINSBURG, Tom; MELTON, James. The content of authoritarian constitutions. In: GINSBURG, Tom; SIMPSER, Alberto (ed.). Constitutions in authoritarian regimes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
ELKINS, Zachary; GINSBURG, Tom; MELTON, James. The endurance of national constitutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
ELKINS, Zachary; GINSBURG, Tom; MELTON, James. Time and constitutional efficacy. In: GINSBURG, Tom; HUQ, Aziz. Assessing constitutional performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.
ELKINS, Zachary; GINSBURG, Tom; SIMMONS, Beth A. Getting to rights: treaty ratification, constitutional convergence, and human rights practice. Harvard International Law Journal, v. 54, n. 1, 2013. Disponível em: https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/bsimmons/files/elkins_ginsburg_simmons_hilj.pdf. Acesso em: 26 mar. 2021.
ELKINS, Zachary; SIMMONS, Beth. On waves, clusters, and diffusion: a conceptual framework. The Annals of the American Academy, v. 598, p. 2, 2004. Disponível em: https://wcfia.harvard.edu/files/wcfia/files/999_annals_page_proofs.pdf. Acesso em: 26 mar. 2021.
ELKINS, Zachary et al. Constitute: the world’s constitutions to read, search, and compare. Journal of Web Semantics, v. 27, 2014. Disponível em: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/journal_articles/7483/. Acesso em: 26 mar. 2021.
ELSTER, Jon. Ulysses unbound: studies in rationality, precommitment, and constraints. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
ELSTER, Jon. Solomonic judgements: studies in the limitations of rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.
FELDMAN, Noah. Imposed constitutionalism. Connecticut Law Review, v. 37, 2005.
FRUHSTORFER, Ann; HEIN, Michael (ed.). Constitutional politics in Central and Eastern Europe: from post-socialist transition to reform of political systems. Wiesbaden: Springer, 2016.
GALLIGAN, Denis J. The people, the Constitution, and the idea of representation. In: GALLIGAN, Denis J.; VERSTEEG, Mila (ed.). Social and political foundations of constitutions. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
GALLIGAN, Denis J.; VERSTEEG, Mila. Theoretical perspectives on the social and political foundations of constitutions. In: GALLIGAN, Denis J.; VERSTEEG, Mila (ed.). Social and political foundations of constitutions. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
GARGARELLA, Roberto. When is a constitution doing well?: the Alberdian test in the Americas. In: GINSBURG, Tom; HUQ, Aziz. Assessing constitutional performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016. p. 99-133.
GINSBURG, Tom. Constitutional specificity, unwritten understandings and constitutional agreement. In: SAJÓ, András; UITZ, Renaita (ed.). Constitutional topography: values and constitutions. The Hague: Eleven International Publishing, 2010.
GINSBURG, Tom. Judicial review in new democracies: constitutional courts in Asian cases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
GINSBURG, Tom; CHERNYKH, Svitlana; ELKINS, Zachary. Commitment and diffusion: how and why national constitutions incorporate international law. University of Illinois Law Review, v. 2008, n. 1, p. 201-237, 2014. Disponível em: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/222930681.pdf. Acesso em: 26 mar. 2021.
GINSBURG, Tom; FOTI, Nick; ROCKMORE, Daniel. “We the peoples”: the global origins of constitutional preambles. The George Washington International Law Review, v. 46, 2014. Disponível em: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1438&context=public_law_and_legal_theory. Acesso em: 26 mar. 2021.
GO, Julian. A globalizing constitutionalism?: views from the postcolony, 1945-2000. International Sociology, v. 18, n. 1, mar. 2003. Disponível em: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0268580903018001005. Acesso em: 26 mar. 2021.
GODERIS, Benedikt; VERSTEEG, Mila. Transnational constitutionalism: a conceptual framework. In: GALLIGAN, Dennis J.; VERSTEEG, Mila (ed.). Social and political foundations of constitutions. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013. p. 103-133.
GOODMAN, Ryan; JINKS, Derek. How to influence States: socialization and international Human Rights Law. Duke Law Journal, v. 54, n. 3, 2004. Disponível em: https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/dlj/vol54/iss3/1/. Acesso em: 26 mar. 2021.
HAMMONS, Christopher W. Was James Madison wrong?: rethinking the american preference for short, framework-oriented constitutions. The American Political Science Review, v. 93, n. 4, 1999. Disponível em: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2586116?seq=1. Acesso em: 26 mar. 2021.
HIRSCHL, Ran. The strategic foundations of constitutions. In: GALLIGAN, Denis J.; VERSTEEG, Mila (ed.). Social and political foundations of constitutions. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
HIRSCHL, Ran. Comparative matters: the renaissance of comparative law. Cambridge: Oxford University Press, 2014.
HUNTINGTON, Samuel P. The third wave: democratization in the last twentieth century. Norman: University of Oklahoma, 1991.
IGNATIEFF, Michael (ed.). American exceptionalism and human rights. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005.
JACOBSOHN, Gary Jeffrey. Constitutional identity. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2010.
KING, Jeff. Constitutions as mission statements. In: GALLIGAN, Denis J.; VERSTEEG, Mila (ed.). Social and political foundations of constitutions. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
KLUG, Heinz. The Constitution of South Africa: a contextual analysis. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2010.
KLUG, Heinz. Model and anti-model: the United States Constitution and “rise of world constitutionalism”. Wisconsin Law Review, v. 2000, n. 3, 2000a. Disponível em: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3523330. Acesso em: 26 mar. 2021.
KLUG, Heinz. Constituting democracy: law, globalism and South Africa’s political reconstruction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000b.
LAW, David S. Constitutions. In: CANE, Peter; KRITZER, Herbert (ed.). The Oxford handbook of empirical legal research. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
LAW, David S. Globalization and the future of constitutional rights. Northwestern University Law Review, v. 102, n. 3, 2008. Disponível em: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228128149_Globalization_and_the_Future_of_Constitutional_Rights. Acesso em: 26 mar. 2021.
LAW, David S. Generic constitutional law. Minnesota Law Review, v. 89, p. 652-742, 2004-2005. Disponível em: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/217211554.pdf. Acesso em: 26 mar. 2021.
LAW, David S. The myth of the imposed constitution. In: GALLIGAN, Dennis J.; VERSTEEG, Mila (ed.). Social and political foundations of constitutions. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
LAW, David S.; VERSTEEG, Mila. The declining influence of the United States Constitution. The New York University Law Review, v. 87, n. 3, 2012. Disponível em: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228126506_The_Declining_Influence_of_the_United_States_Constitution. Acesso em: 26 mar. 2021.
LAW, David S.; VERSTEEG, Mila. The evolution and ideology of global constitutionalism. California Law Review, v. 99, n. 5, 2011. Disponível em: https://www.jstor.org/stable/41345383?seq=1. Acesso em: 26 mar. 2021.
LAW, David S.; VERSTEEG, Mila. Sham constitutions. California Law Review, v. 101, n. 4, p. 863-952, Aug. 2013. Disponível em: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1989979. Acesso em: 26 mar. 2021.
LINOS, Katerina. Diffusion through democracy. American Journal of Political Science, v. 55, n. 3, 2011. Disponível em: https://www.jstor.org/stable/23024944?seq=1. Acesso em: 26 mar. 2021.
LOEWENSTEIN, Karl. Teoría de la constitución. 2. ed. Barcelona: Editora Ariel, 1986.
LUTZ, Donald S. Principles of constitutional design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
MEUWESE, Anne. Popular constitution-making: the case of Iceland. In: GALLIGAN, Dennis J.; VERSTEEG, Mila (ed.). Social and political foundations of constitutions. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
MONTENEGRO, Alvaro A. Constitutional design and economic performance. Constitutional Political Economy, v. 6, n. 2, 1995. Disponível em: https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/copoec/v6y1995i2p161-169.html. Acesso em: 26 mar. 2021.
MURPHY, Walter F. Constitutional democracy: creating and maintaining a just political order. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2007.
NAVOT, Suzie. The Constitution of Israel: a contextual analysis. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2014.
NEGRETTO, Gabriel L. Making constitutions: presidents, parties, and institutional choice in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
NEGRETTO, Gabriel L. Replacing and amending constitutions: the logic of constitutional change in Latin America. Law and Society Review, v. 46, n. 4, 2012. Disponível em: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2012.00516.x. Acesso em: 26 mar. 2021.
NEVES, Marcelo. A constitucionalização simbólica. 3. ed. São Paulo: WMF Martins Fontes, 2011.
O’BRIEN, Derek. The constitutional systems of the commonwealth Caribbean: a contextual analysis. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2014.
OSIATYNSKI, Wiktor. Paradoxes of constitutional borrowing. International Journal of Constitutional Law, v. 1, n. 2, 2003. Disponível em: https://academic.oup.com/icon/article/1/2/244/650658. Acesso em: 26 mar. 2021.
PARAU, Christina E. Romania’s transnational constitution: a traditional of elite learning and self-empowerment. In: GALLIGAN, Dennis J.; VERSTEEG, Mila (ed.). Social and Political Foundations of Constitutions. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2015. p. 497-531.
PARKINSON, Charles. Bills of rights and decolonization: the emergence of domestic human rights instruments in Britain’s overseas territories. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
PERJU, Vlad. Constitutional transplants, borrowing, and migrations. In: ROSENFELD, Michel; SAJÓ, András (ed.). Oxford handbook of comparative constitutional law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. p. 1204-1327.
POSNER, Eric A; SUNSTEIN, Cass R. On learning from others. Stanford Law Review, v. 59, 2006. Disponível em: https://www.stanfordlawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2010/04/posner.pdf. Acesso em: 26 mar. 2021.
ROSENFELD, Michel; SAJÓ, András (ed.). Oxford handbook of comparative constitutional law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
SARMENTO, Daniel. Constituição e globalização. Revista de Direito Administrativo, Rio de Janeiro, v. 215, 1999.
SARTORI, Giovanni. Comparative constitutional engineering: an inquiry into structures, incentives and outcomes. New York: New York University Press, 1997.
SAUDERS, Cheryl. The Constitution of Australia: a contextual analysis. Portland: Hart Publishing, 2011.
SCHNEIER, Edward. Crafting constitutional democracies: the politics of institutional design. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2006.
SHAPIRO, Martin; STONE-SWEET, Alec. On law, politics, and judicialization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.
SLAUGHTER, Anne-Marie. A new world order. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2004.
SMITH, Eivind. Give and take: cross-fertilisation of concepts in constitutional law. In: BEATSON, Jack; TRIDIMAS, Takis (ed.). New directions in european public law. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1998. p. 101-124.
TAMANAHA, Brian Z. Battle between law and society in Micronesia. In: GALLIGAN, Denis J.; VERSTEEG, Mila (ed.). Social and political foundations of constitutions. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013. p. 584.
THIER, J. Alexander. Big tent, small tent: the making of a constitution in Afghanistan. In: MILLER, Laurel E (ed.). Framing the State in times of transition: case studies in constitution making. Washington: USIP, 2010. p. 535-562.
TUSHNET, Mark. Advance introduction to comparative constitutional law. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 2014.
TUSHNET, Mark. The Constitution of the United States of America: a contextual analysis. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2009.
TUSHNET, Mark. The possibilities of comparative constitutional law. Yale Law Journal, v. 108, n. 6, 1999. Disponível em: https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/ylj/vol108/iss6/2/. Acesso em: 26 mar. 2021.
VERSTEEG, Mila. Unpopular constitutionalism. Indiana Law Journal, v. 89, n. 3, 2014. Disponível em: https://ilj.law.indiana.edu/articles/9-Versteeg.pdf. Acesso em: 26 mar. 2021.
VOIGT, Stefan. Explaining constitutional garrulity. International Review of Law and Economics, v. 29, n. 4, 2009. Disponível em: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222281028_Explaining_Constitutional_Garrulity. Acesso em: 26 mar. 2021.
WALLIS, Joanne. Constitution making during state building. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
WEBBER, Jeremy. The Constitution of Canada: a contextual analysis. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2015
WEINRIB, Lorraine E. The postwar paradigm and American exceptionalism. In: CHOUDHRY, Sujit (ed.). The migration of constitutional ideas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
WISE, Edward M. The transplant of legal patterns. The American Journal of Comparative Law, v. 38, 1990.
YOUNG, Iris M. Inclusion and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2021 Alonso Freire
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
