Smart dispute resolution: Artificial intelligence to reduce litigation

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53798/suprema.2023.v3.n1.a215

Palavras-chave:

Inteligência artificial, Smart Dispute Resolution, Redução de litigiosidade, Método comparativo, Processo Civil

Resumo

Artificial intelligence, despite still being a developing technology, can be considered an inevitability in law, as it is in any other field. Described in Germany as part of a 4th Industrial Revolution, it confirms no battle against evolution would be fruitful. Nevertheless, given AI is a certainty in the future of law, the applications should be debated. The objective here is to exam applications of AI in Law in Brazil and in the United States of America, and to evaluate its use to resolve conflicts outside the Judicial System, instead of through Justice. With the assistance of the comparative and deductive methods and the Cartesian doubt to process the data, the main conclusion is that AI is more useful for simple and repetitive litigation, and it could deliver benefits through dispute resolution outside the Judicial System, with smart technologies, resulting on a Smart Dispute Resolution alternative.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Bruno de Macedo Dias, Universidade do Vale do Itajaí (Itajaí, SC, Brasil)

es candidato a Doctorado en Ciencias Jurídicas (SJD) en la Facultad de Derecho de Delaware (Wilmington/DE/EE.UU.) y UNIVALI (Itajaí/SC/Brasil). Master of Laws (LLM) en Derecho Ambiental y de la Sostenibilidad en la Universidad de Alicante (Alicante/España) y Master of Laws (LLM) en UNIVALI (Itajaí/SC/Brasil). Procurador del Estado de Santa Catarina (PGE/SC/Brasil).

Referências

AGÊNCIA NACIONAL DE TELECOMUNICAÇÕES. Registrar reclamação. Available in: < https://www.gov.br/anatel/pt-br/consumidor/quer-reclamar/reclamacao>. Last visited in 06 Apr. 2023.

ASSAD NETO, Anis. Et al. A busca de uma nova identidade para a indústria 4.0. Brazilian Journal of Development. Vol. 4. Curitiba: July/Set. 2018.

BRAZIL. Lei nº 13.105, de 16 de março de 2015. Código de Processo Civil. Published in 17 mar. 2015. Available in: < http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105.htm>. Last visited in 04 May 2022.

BRAZIL. Ministério da Justiça. Consumidor.gov.br (online). Available in: <https://www.consumidor.gov.br>. Last visited in 02 Nov. 2022.

BRAZIL. Supremo Tribunal Federal. Projeto VICTOR do STF é apresentado em congresso internacional sobre tecnologia. Published in 26 set 2018. Available in: <http://www.stf.jus.br/portal/cms/verNoticiaDetalhe.asp?idConteudo=390818>. Last visited in 27 June 2019.

BRENNAN-MARQUEZ, Kiel. HENDERSON, Stephen E. Artificial Intelligence and Role-Reversible Judgment. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, Vol 109, 2019. pp. 137-169.

CAPPELLETTI, Mauro. GARTH, Bryant. Access to Justice: The Newest Wave in the Worldwide Movement to Make Rights Effective. Buffalo Law Review, vol. 27, 1978. pp. 181-292.

CITRON, Danelle Keats. Technological due process. Washington University Law Review. Vol. 85, p. 1249-1313, 2008.

DIAS, Bruno de Macedo. A constitucionalidade de filtros ao Acesso à Justiça para assegurar o funcionamento sustentável do Poder Judiciário. Rio de Janeiro: Lumen Juris, 2017.

FGV. Artificial Intelligence: First Forum on Law and Technology. Available in: <https://ciapj.fgv.br/sites/ciapj.fgv.br/files/anais_ia_ingles.pdf>. 2020. Last visited in 20 Dec. 2022.

FGV. Report on Artificial Intelligence: technology Applied to conflict management within the Brazilian Judiciary. 2nd Edition. 2022. Available in: <https://ciapj.fgv.br/sites/ciapj.fgv.br/files/report_ia_2edition.pdf>. Last visited in 05 Jan. 2023.

FGV. Report on Artificial Intelligence: technology Applied to conflict resolution in the Brazilian Judiciary. 1st Edition. 2020. Available in: <https://ciapj.fgv.br/sites/ciapj.fgv.br/files/report_ai_ciapj.pdf>. Last visited in 05 Jan. 2023.

FREITAS, Juarez. FREITAS, Thomas Bellini. Direito e Inteligência Artificial: em defesa do humano. Belo Horizonte: Forum, 2020.

GALANTER, Marc. The Vanishing Trial: an Examination of Trials and Related Matters in Federal and State Courts. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, Vol. 1, Issue 3, p. 459-570, November, 2004.

GIUFFRIDA, Iria. LEDERER, Fredric. VERMEYS, Nicolas. A Legal Perspective on the Trials and Tribulations of AI: How Artificial Intelligence, the Internet of Things, Smart Contracts, and Other Technologies Will Affect the Law. Case Western Reserve Law Review, Vol. 68-3, 2018. pp. 747-781.

GIUFFRIDA, Iria. Liability for AI Decision-Making: Some Legal and Ethical Considerations. Fordham Law Review, Vol. 88, 2019.

HANNAFORD-AGOR, Paula. Measuring the cost of civil litigation: Findings from a survey of trial lawyers. Voir Dire, Primavera, 2013.

HARTMANN PEIXOTO, Fabiano. Inteligência artificial e direito: convergência ética e estratégica. Curitiba: Alteridade Editora, 2020.

GERMAN TRADE & INVEST. INDUSTRIE 4.0: Smart manufacturing for the future. Berlin: Germany, 2014. Available in: <https://www.gtai.de/GTAI/Content/CN/Invest/_SharedDocs/Downloads/GTAI/Brochures/Industries /industrie4.0-smart-manufacturing-for-the-future-en.pdf>. Last visited in 27 June 2019.

KATSH, Ethan. RABINOVICH-EINY, Orna. Digital Justice: Reshaping Boundaries in an Online Dispute Resolution Environment. International Journal of Online Dispute Resolution, v. 1, n. 1, 2014.

KATSH, Ethan. RULE, Colin. What We Know and Need to Know about Online Dispute Resolution. South Carolina Law Review. Vol. 67, 2016.

LEE, Kai-fu. AI Superpowers: China, Silicon Valley and the New World Order. Noston: Houghton Miffin Harcourt, 2018.

LIN, Tom C. W. Artificial Intelligence, Finance, and the Law. Fordham Law Review, Vol. 88, 2019. pp. 531-552.

MARCHANT, Gary E. Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Legal Practice. 14 Southern Methodist University Science and Technology Law Review. Vol, 14, 2017.

MAYSON, Sandra G. Bias in, bias out. The Yale Law Journal. Vol. 128, p. 2218-2300, 2019.

MELO, Lilian M. Cintra de. Enduring issues of digital exclusion, emerging pressures of internet regulation in Brazil. Suprema: Revista de estudos constitucionais, v. 2, n. 1, p. 287-326. Jan./Jun. 2022.

MCKINSEY & CO. An Executive’s Guide to AI. Available in: <https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/quantumblack/our-insights/an-executives-guideto-ai>. Last visited in 07 Nov. 2022.

MILLER, Arthur. Widening the Lens: Refocusing the Litigation Cost-and-Delay Narrative. Cardozo Law Review, vol. 40, 2018.

MINAS GERAIS. Tribunal de Justiça. TJMG utiliza inteligência artificial em julgamento virtual. Published in 07 Nov. 2018. Available in: <https://www.tjmg.jus.br/portal-tjmg/noticias/tjmg-utiliza-inteligencia-artificial-em-julgamentovirtual.htm#.XAlB2ntKiM8>. last visited in 07 Nov. 2022.

MOREIRA, José Carlos Barbosa. Temas de direito processual: oitava série. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2004.

NEWELL, Ryan P. E-Discovery Promised Land: The Use of E-Neutrals to Aid the Court, Counsel, and Parties. Delaware Law Review, Vol. 15, 2014.

SURDEN, Harry. Artificial intelligence and law: an overwiew. Georgia State University Law Review. Vol. 35, 2019.

U.S. CHAMBER INSTITUTE FOR LEGAL REFORM. LAWYERS FOR CIVIL JUSTICE. CIVIL JUSTICE REFORM GROUP. Litigation Cost Survey of Major Companies. Delivered to Committee on Rules of Pactice and Procedure Judicial Conference of the United States. Duke Law School, May, 2010. Available in <https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default /files/litigation_cost_survey_of_major_companies_0.pdf>. Last visited in 29 Oct. 2022.

WILLIAMS, Rebecca A. Rethinking Deference for Algorithmic Decision-Making. Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper n. 07, 2019.

Artigos

Downloads

Publicado

2023-06-30

Como Citar

JACOBSEN, G.; DIAS, B. de M. Smart dispute resolution: Artificial intelligence to reduce litigation. Suprema - Revista de Estudos Constitucionais, Distrito Federal, Brasil, v. 3, n. 1, p. 391–414, 2023. DOI: 10.53798/suprema.2023.v3.n1.a215. Disponível em: https://suprema.stf.jus.br/index.php/suprema/article/view/215. Acesso em: 3 mar. 2024.